County must come up with $575,000 in budget cuts for ’10 & ’11 PDF Print
By Charlie Warner
Argus News Editor


 Coming up with $260,000 more in cuts in the 2010 budget when already two months into 2010 and an additional $320,000 in cuts for 2011 is going to be quite an endeavor. But that’s exactly what the Houston County Board of Commissioners and staff is facing.

County Finance Director Casey Bradley brought the discussion to the March 2 board meeting.

“We need to get working on this right now,” Bradley told the board. “We can’t wait until we find out what the final figure is going to be in late March. Waiting will just have more negative impacts.”

Bradley told the board he has scheduled meetings with department heads every two weeks to discuss ways of handling the drastic cuts in county program aid (CPA).

The county is facing a two-year cut in (CPA) of $1.522 million if the plans Gov. Tim Pawlenty announced Feb. 15 become a reality.

To erase the projected $1.2 billion budget deficit, Gov. Pawlenty proposed to cut aid to cities and counties by $250 million.

Houston County was certified to receive $1,149,468 in CPA for 2010. That total was cut by $243,243 last fall during the 2009 unallotments announced by Pawlenty. At that time, the county cut approximately $250,000 from the 2010 budget to handle the unallotment.

If the current proposal by the Governor stands, the county will receive $447,761 in 2010, which is a cut of $701,707 over what was originally certified for 2010 by the state. Using the same formula for 2011, Houston County will receive $329,021 next year, which would be a cut of $820,447.

While the state aid cuts are not engraved in stone and still require both state House and Senate approval, Bradley predicts the cuts will be drastic.

“We’re suppose to receive our first CPA payment July 26 and our second one Dec. 26,” Bradley pointed out. “I just hope they (the state) make a final decision soon so we can make concrete contingency plans now.”

The board and department heads agree that the only items that won’t be on the chopping block are mandated programs.

“The mandated programs we’ll have to keep in the budget. Everything else will be up for budget amendments,” Bradley continued.

Bradley added that worksheets have been sent out to all the department heads. They have been asked to go through their budgets line by line to determine which expenditures are mandated, listing the state or federal statute requiring the expenditure and what services are provided.

Bradley then asked how the county board wanted him to handle the additional five employees that will be required to staff the Justice Center once it is completed in 2011. The bond payment for the Justice Center which Bradley feels will be somewhere between $500,000 and $600,000 is another item that must be considered.

Commissioner Larry Connery suggested the proposed cuts be divided into two tiers. Tier one would include the anticipated $577,000 the county will be faced to make in the 2010 and 2011 budgets if the current estimates in CPA cuts plays out. Tier two would include the costs of the Justice Center.

“Until we get the bids, we really don’t know what figures to use,” Connery pointed out. “We will know a lot more in May when the bids come in.”

Bradley also posed the question if the cuts the county will be making in the upcoming months will be permanent ones. He noted that predictions are that the state’s budget deficit will be much worse in the next biennium. At this point, no one has an answer to that question. 
Comments (9)add
...
written by STILL SPENDING , March 09, 2010
Just a couple of questions for the board. How much do you plan to spend on the CJC?? How much will that cost each average joe?? Is building a CJC mandated?? Is building a new county shop mandated?? What are you guys thinking?? The writing is on the wall!! Income from the state level is on the way out!!! Who do you think is going to pay for your mistakes??? I think you ought to forget about spending any of "our" money!!! That includes the CJC!! You got us into this mess, now I want a firm plan to get us out!!
...
written by Hope They Spend More , March 11, 2010
Still Spending - have you been living under a rock? Or are you one of those people that just decide that no matter what information you are provided, it must be wrong because you don't agree with it? The cost of the CJC has been publicized and half of the bonding is already in the bank. The cost of the CJC is a little over 19 million. Is the CJC mandated? - Yes, or the jail will be shut down and all prisoners will have to be sent to other counties at great expense to the taxpayers. The county shop is not mandated, but the cost to fix and update the current building would not be COST BENEFICIAL (Google that if you don't understand it). What mistakes have the County Board made - they don't make the laws or set what money comes from the State, otherwise I think things would be much better. If you think it would be better off to have the State legislators take over County Government - I think you would stand alone. Instead of aksing questions that have already been answered NUMEROUS times before, present ideas that would actually save money. Not building the CJC will cost us MORE money in the long run. I support our County Board and the decisions that they are making. I do think they have made a mistake though - they are building it much too small and they should take the opportunity now to make it larger and include the basement as it will be cheaper to do so now, than 20 or 30 years from now.
...
written by STILL SPENDING , March 12, 2010
All I can say is WOW... Do you think that it would be cheaper to build a 20 million dollar "jail" then it would be to haul prisoners to a tri-county jail?? Have you done the math on what just the interest payments would be on 20 million dollars?? Have you read the studies on declining jail populations?? Have you read the stories about the jails not to far west of us that are sitting empty?? They to had the idea of trying to make money off of prisoners. That gamble failed. Period. As far as the county shop, why did this building fall into such disrepair?? If I decided that I didn't want to take care of my house and let it fall into disrepair, would you like to pay for me to build a much bigger much more elborate house?? Probably not. I have said all along that a jail is needed. What they are planning is not!! You and all the other taxpayers in houston county need to sit down and consider the big picture. When taxes go up from every direction (state, fed, and county) why would anyone want to live, work, or do business in houston county?? That folks is some eye opening stuff. Think about it.
...
written by STILL SPENDING , March 12, 2010
I forgot to address the "mistakes" the board has made. Number 1 The Meyer Building. Have you seen the total dollars spent and what it is costing per month?? Number 2 the land behind the school bought for the PWF. What are they going to do with the land they already own by the fair grounds?? Whould that have not made much more sense?? Number 3 the first round of bonding that they went through for the meyer building and for paying the firm designing the CJC (approaching 1 MILLION DOLLARS!!) That first round changed the bonding "grade" for houston county. Now the interest rate for all the rest of the bonding that the county does will likely be at three times the interest rate of the first round. Do you know what that will cost?? I would be happy to keep going but I think you get the idea.
...
written by stuart , March 12, 2010
Sounds like still spending does have facts to support his/her claim. Whether or not they are 100% fact they should make people sit down and think about these projects very closely. Thank still for your view point.
...
written by bill albert , March 12, 2010
What are the odds that "Hope They Spend More" works for the county.
Boy, would i like a piece of that action!
...
written by frugal , March 14, 2010
As I stated previously, build the jail portion (the state is backing us into a corner on that one) and courtroom. The offices can wait. Employees can walk acrosse the lawn from the Courthouse. Finish the rest of the building when the economy is a little better. I agree with you "Still Spending", why was the county highway building allowed to fall into such disrepair. The highway building can wait, and I believe it should also be downsized. Right now it seems to be a little on the extravagant side.
...
written by STILL SPENDING , March 15, 2010
Well the time to act is now! I have put calls into the board members and the only one that will call back is Jack. We need to know what this will cost us before they just start the project. Why do you think they delayed the bid openings?? It will go just like clockwork. 1.Get the low bid 2.Dig a hole in the ground 3.Try to explain how we are going to pay for it. Backwords! Come on people get a hold of your Commissioners and ask them to tell you what it will cost. How can they not know? They just don't want to tell you. Remember the new school, "will cost each taxpayer a can of pop a day"....... Here we go. Now they want to join the schools. Then we will have not one but 2 empty schools in the middle of town. Don't worry though who needs schools and kids to fill them if you have a 80 bed prision in town.
...
written by tax payer, , March 17, 2010
i agree with still spending.just like the old elementary school lets just quit maintaining it.then we'll get a new school. same thing with the county shop.the entrance to the county shop looks like heck give it a good painting,but no thats the first thing they want people to see when they walk in.so then people will think maybee we do need one.MAINTAINACE!!!!
Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
RocketTheme Joomla Templates